Srpski
INSTRUMENTS SPECIFIC TO THE PROCESS OF SUBSTANTIATING MANAGERIAL DECISIONS AT THE ORGANIZATION’S LEVEL
​
Mihalciuc Camelia Cătălina
Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, University Stefan cel Mare Suceava, str. Universitatii, no. 13, Romania
Grosu Maria
Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University Al. I. Cuza Iași, Bulevardul Carol I, nr. 22 Romania

DOI:   ​​doi.org/10.31410/Balkans.JETSS.2019.2.2.194-209
Balkans Journal of Emerging Trends in Social Sciences, (2019) , Vol 2, No 2
ISSN: 2620-164X
Abstract:    The main objective of this paper is first to analyze those instruments that have proven to be useful in time and have the merit of being able to be used in the decision-making processes of all types of organizations such as the tree decision-making or decision table and on the other hand, another important aspect is the presentation of the organization’s integrated piloting tools such as scoreboard and balanced scorecard, tools that allow managers to dispose, in real time, of a synthetic view of the main indicators of the organization and the business environment for taking decisions under their competence.

Keywords:   Scoreboard, Balanced scorecard, Tree Decision-Making, Decision Table, Experiment  and Decision-Making Simulation

JEL Classifications L66 · M11 · M49

 REFERENCES

  • Aidemark, L. G., Baraldi, S., Funck, E. K., & Jansson, A. (2010). The importance of balanced score­cards in hospitals. In M.J. Epstein, J.F. Manzoni, & A. Davila (Eds.), Performance Measure­ment and Management Control: Innovative Concepts and Practices (pp. 363 – 385), Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting, Volume 20, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Howard House.
  • Albu N., & Albu C. (2003). Instrumente de management al performanţei, vol. II, Control de gesti­une, Bucureşti, Romania: Editura Tribuna Economică.
  • Aureli, S., Cardoni, A., Del Baldo, M., & Lombardi, R. (2018). The balanced scorecard logic in the management control and reporting of small business company networks: A case study, Accounting and Management Information Systems, 17(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.24818/ jamis 2018.02001
  • Băileşteanu, G. (2002). Logică economică, Timişoara, Romania: Editura Mirton.
  • Baker, M. J. (2005). Marketing, Bucureşti, Romania: Editura Ştiinţă şi Tehnică.
  • Bărbulescu, C. (2000). Pilotajul performant al întreprinderii, Bucureşti, Romania: Editura Eco­nomică.
  • Berheci, M. (2008). The Annual Reports And Financial Decisions, Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, „1 Decembrie 1918” University, Romania, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(10), 1-17.
  • Bostan, I, & Grosu, V. (2011). Contribution of balance scorecard model in efficiency of managerial control, Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pp. 178-199.
  • Bouquin, H. (2004). Contabilitate de gestiune, traducere Tabără, N., Iași, Romania: Ed. Tipo Mol­dova.
  • Burkert, M., Davila, A., & Oyon, D. (2010). Performance consequences of balanced scorecard adop­tions: claim for large-scale evidence and propositions for future research. In M.J. Epstein, J.F. Manzoni, & A. Davila (Eds.), Performance Measurement and Management Control: Innovative Concepts and Practices (pp. 345 – 363), Studies in Managerial and Financial Ac­counting, Volume 20, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Howard House.
  • Chirița, N., & Bradea, I. A. (2012). Using Computer for Enterprise Risk Management, A șaptea ediție a Conferinței Internaționale de Analiză de Cibernetică Economică – The New Econom­ic Crisis: Evolution and Recovering Ways – NEC2012, Editura ASE, București.
  • De Felice, F., Petrillo, A., & Autorino, C. (2015). Development of a Framework for Sustainable Outsourcing: Analytic Balanced Scorecard Method (A-BSC), Sustainability, 7, 8399-8419. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7078399
  • De Geuser, F., Mooraj, S., & Oyon, D. (2009). Does the Balanced Scorecard Add Value? Empirical Evidence on its Effect on Performance, European Accounting Review, 18(1), 93-122. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09638180802481698
  • Falle, S., Rauter, R., Engert, S., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2016). Sustainability Management with the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard in SMEs: Findings from an Austrian Case Study, Sustain­ability, 8, 545-561. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8060545
  • Filip, F.G. (2002). Decizie asistată de calculator: decizii, decidenţi, metode şi instrumente de bază, Bucureşti, Romania: Editura Expert şi EdituraTehnică.
  • Ionescu, G., Cazan, E., & Negruţa, A. L. (1999). Modelarea şi optimizarea deciziilor manageriale, Cluj-Napoca, Romania: Editura Dacia.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. In Kaplan, R.S.; Norton, D.P. (2001) Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. Accounting Horizons, 15(1), 87–104.
  • Kim, D., & Kim, S. (2018). Sustainable Education: Analyzing the Determinants of University Student Dropout by Nonlinear Panel Data Models, Sustainability 10, 954-972. https://doi. org/10.3390/su10040954
  • Mihăilă, S., & Badicu, G. (2016). Informaţia contabilităţii de gestiune – sursă fundamentala în anal­iza performanţei dezvoltării durabile a entităţilor. In Paradigm of accounting and auditing: national realities, regional and international trends, Communications of the International Scientific Conference, 5th Edition dedicated to the Professional Accountant’s day, April 2016, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.
  • Mihalciuc, C., Costaș, R., & Barnea L., (2017). Concepții referitoare la managementul și măsurarea performanței firmei, Conferința Științifică Internaținală Paradigme finaciar-contabile în vi­ziunea tinerilor cercetători, (pp. 119-124), Chișinău.
  • Mihalciuc, C., (2018), Tools designed to analyse the enterprise economic risk and its usefulness for forecasting and managerial control. In C., Nastase (Ed.) book: Strategies and development policies of territories. International, country region, city location challenges, Lumen Pro­cedings, vol. 6, (pp. 361-374), no. 1,Romania, Iași.
  • Mintzberg, H. (2008). Ascensiunea şi declinul planificării strategice, Bucureşti, Romania: Editura Publica.
  • Negescu, M.D., (2004). Informaţia financiară – suport în luarea deciziilor, Revista Contabilitate şi informatică de gestiune nr. 9/2004, Editura ASE, Bucureşti.
  • Paterson, T. T. (1996). Management Theory, London, UK.
  • Popa, I.A. (2009). Sisteme de asistare a deciziilor adaptate în organizaţii, Editura Economică, București.
  • Popa, V., (2005). Managementul și măsurarea performanței organizației, Târgul Mureș, Romania: Editura Valahia University Press.
  • Radu, I., & Vlădeanu, D. (2007). Fundamentarea deciziilor complexe din tehnici desimulare, Bu­cureşti, Romania, Editura Economică.
  • Simon, N. A. (1977). The new science of Management Decision, Ed. Rev. Englewood Cliffs NJ Prentice Hall.
  • Ștefănescu, D., & Silivestru, M. (2012). Balanced Scorecard - instrument de planificare strategică, Romanian Statistical Review 2, 6-23.
  • Ștefănescu, D., Silivestru, M., Topor, I. D., & Marc, M. A. (2017). Măsurarea performanței în contextual aplicării standardelor internaționale de raportare financiară. In Paradigme fina­ciar-contabile în viziunea tinerilor cercetători, Conferința Științifică Internaținală Para­digme finaciar-contabile în viziunea tinerilor cercetători, (pp. 84-87), Chișinău.
  • Trifu, A. (2009). Universul multidimensional al deciziei, Bucureşti, Romania: Editura Economică.

balkans_jetss_vol_2_no_2_194-209.pdf
File Size: 1200 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
Picture
Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans
- UdEkoM Balkan -
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
E-mail: [email protected]
www.udekom.org.rs
Tel. +381 62 812 5779
VAT number: 108747027
Registration number.: 28157347
© COPYRIGHT 2014-2024. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.