|
INVESTIGATING THE INFLUENCE OF PERSONAL TRAITS ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEADER AND MEMBER IN TOURISM AND PUBLIC SECTOR Igor Stamenković Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia Tatjana Vanić City Administration for Economy – City of Novi Sad, Rumenačka 110a, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia Tamara Gajić Novi Sad School of Business, Vladimira Perića – Valtera 4, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/tmt.2019.617 4th International Thematic Monograph - Modern Management Tools and Economy of Tourism Sector in Present Era, Belgrade, 2019, Published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans in cooperation with the Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality, Ohrid, North Macedonia; ISSN 2683-5673, ISBN 978-86-80194-29-5; Editors: Vuk Bevanda, associate professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia; Snežana Štetić, full time professor, The College of Tourism, Belgrade, Serbia, Printed by: SKRIPTA International, Belgrade
|
|
Abstract: This study examines the effect of a certain personality dimensions and relationships between leaders and followers in the context of tourism and the public sector. It also highlights the fact that the personal characteristics of the employees are important for the organization and can be a „tool” for improving the organizational and operational performance. The analysis included 200 respondents in the services sector (tourism and public sector in Serbia). The tourism sector is characterized by entrepreneurial skills of the owner and the ability to market positioning, while the public sector operates within the legal norms in the service of the citizens. In order to achieve the goals of the research, for the analysis of independent T-test, correlation and regression were used. These findings can be used in the implementation of new techniques in organizational contexts. Keywords: Personal traits, LMX, BFI, Tourism, Public Sector, Service Sector. REFERENCES Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47:1, (Whole No. 211). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093360 Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26. Bauer, T. N., Erdogan, B., Liden, R. C., & Wayne, S. J. (2006). A Longitudinal Study of the Moderating Role of Extraversion: Leader-Member Exchange, Performance, and Turnover During New Executive Development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 298-310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.298 Bernerth, B. J., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, S. H., Giles, F. W., & Walker, H. J. (2008). The Influence of Personality Differences Between Subordinates and Supervisors on Perceptions of LMX. Group & Organization Management, 33(2), 216-240. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vison. Organisational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2005). Personality and Intellectual Competence, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612649 Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. (2000). Toward an Integrative Theory of Training Motivation: A Meta-Analytic Path of Analysis of 20 Years of Research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 678–707. Costa, E T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 853–863. Costa, E T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership with informal organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46- 78. Day, D. V., & Miscenko, D. (2015). Leader-Member Exchange Theory (LMX): Construct evolution, contributions, and future prospects for advancing leadership theory. In T. N. Bauer & B. Erdogan (Eds.). The Oxford Handbooks of leader-member exchange. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199326174.001.0001 Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11, 618-634. Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2015). Leader-member exchange theory. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition, 641–647. Erdogan, B., & Liden, R. C. (2002). Social exchanges in the workplace: A review of recent developments and future research directions in leader-member exchange theory. In L. L. Neider & C. A. Schriesheim (Eds.): Leadership. Greenwich, CT: Information Age. 65-114. Grant, S., & Langan-Fox, J. (2007). Personality and the occupational stressor-strain relationship: The role of the big five. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 20–33. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An Alternative “Description of Personality”: The Big-Five Structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 59(6), 1216-1229. https://doi. org/10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216 Grаen, B. G., & Cashman, J. (1975). A role making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In J. Hunt & L. Larson (Eds). Leadership Frontiers. Kent, OH: Comparative Administration Research Institute, Kent State University. Grean, B. G., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175-208. Graеn, B. G., & Uhl-Bien, М. (1995). Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective, Management Department Faculty Publications, Paper 57, Nebraska. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.). Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: Guilford Press. 2, 102–138. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.). Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York, NY: Guilford, Vol. 3, 114–158. Judge, A. T., Bono, E. J., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, W. M. (2002). Personality and Leadership: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765-780. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.765 Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader-Member Exchange Theory: The Past and Potential for the Future. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Vol. 15, 47-120. Louis, M. R., (1980). Surprise and Sense Making: What Newcomers Experience in Entering Unfamiliar Organizational Settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(2), 226-251. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392453 McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford. McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992. tb00970.x Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89. Piedmont, R. L., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1991). Adjective check list scales and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 630–637. Schyns, B., Maslyn, J. M., & Van Veldhoven, M. P. M. (2012). Can some leaders have a good relationship with many followers?: The role of personality in the relationship between Leader-Member Exchange and span of control. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33(6), 594-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437731211253046 Teng, C. (2008). Personality Differences Between Online Game Players and Non-Players in a Student Sample. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 11(2), 232-234. Uhl-Bein, M. (2006). Relational Leadership Theory. Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 654-676. Wayne, S. J., & Green, S. A. (1993). The effects of leader–member exchange on employee citizenship and impression management behaviour. Human Relations, 46, 1431–1440. Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 
| |||
Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans
- UdEkoM Balkan -
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
E-mail: office@udekom.org.rs
www.udekom.org.rs
- UdEkoM Balkan -
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
E-mail: office@udekom.org.rs
www.udekom.org.rs
Tel. +381 62 812 5779
VAT number: 108747027
Registration number.: 28157347
Registration number.: 28157347