What We Can Learn from the Process of Urbanization of a Mountain Tourist Resort: The Zlatibor Case
Milorad Filipović - University of Belgrade, Faculty of Economics, Kamenička 6, Belgrade, Serbia
Miroljub Hadžić - University Singidunum Belgrade, Faculty of Business, Danijelova 29, Belgrade, Serbia
Miodrag Vujošević - Institute of Urbanism and Spatial Planning RS, Bulevar kralja Aleksandra, Belgrade, Serbia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/tmt.2021-2022.501
Milorad Filipović - University of Belgrade, Faculty of Economics, Kamenička 6, Belgrade, Serbia
Miroljub Hadžić - University Singidunum Belgrade, Faculty of Business, Danijelova 29, Belgrade, Serbia
Miodrag Vujošević - Institute of Urbanism and Spatial Planning RS, Bulevar kralja Aleksandra, Belgrade, Serbia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/tmt.2021-2022.501
6th International Thematic Monograph - Modern Management Tools and Economy of Tourism Sector in Present Era, Belgrade, 2021/2022, Published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans in cooperation with the Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality, Ohrid, North Macedonia; ISSN 2683-5673, ISBN 978-86-80194-49-3; Editors: Vuk Bevanda, associate professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia; Snežana Štetić, full time professor, The College of Tourism, Belgrade, Serbia, Printed by: SKRIPTA International, Belgrade
Abstract: Serbia started the transition in 2000 using a neoliberal development approach. Since 2012, a populist model of development has been underway. In such an environment the mountain tourist resort of Zlatibor became an example of an inadequate decision-making process, with inevitable negative long-term outcomes. Speeding up in reforming construction permits, unfortunately, made room for too fast urbanization of Zlatibor.
Granting construction permits on the local level, without a comprehensive development plan of the destination as a broaden development frame, was a wrong reforming step. It is complicated by political fighting between the top (Republican) level and local level of governing, regarding interests. An additional problem is related to the wrong defined place for decision – making process. Namely, Zlatibor became too large and too rich for its local capital, Čajetina.
The aim of the paper is firstly, to envisage development problems of Zlatibor, potentially “Mountain Kaludjerica”, like ecological, infrastructure and touristic disaster, if rapid, chaotic urbanization continues, and secondly, to point out some institutional, decision making and practical steps toward neutralization of these negative outcomes.
Keywords: Tourism; Sustainable development; Spatial development; Urbanism
REFERENCES
Bukvić, R. (2010) Morgentauov plan i Vašingtonski konsenzus: ima li razvojnog izlaza za zemlje
u tranziciji, Zbornik Kriza i razvoj, Institut društvenih nauka, Beograd, (pp7-28), ISBN:
978-86-7093-133-6
Boljanović, S.& Hadžić M. (2017) Impact of foreign direct investments on Serbian industry,
Industrija, 45 (3), 39-64. DOI: 310.5937
Chang, H.J. (2002), Breaking the mould: an institutionalist political economy alternative to the
neo-liberal theory of the market and the state. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26 (5):
539-559, doi:10.1093/CJE/26.5.539
Chang, H.J. and I. Grabel (2004) Reclaiming development from the Washington consensus, Journal
of post Keynesian economics, 27 (2): 273–291doi: 10.1080/01603477.2004.11051434.
European Commission, (2004), Fostering structural change, industrial policy in enlarged
Europe, EC, Brussels
European Commission (2010), Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive
Growth, EC, Brussels
Government of the Republic of Serbia. Ministry of Trade, Tourism and Telecommunications,
(2016), Strategy for the Development of Tourism of Serbia for the period 2016-2025,
Belgrade
International Monetary Fund (2021), World Economic Outlook, March 2021, Washington D.C.
Lux, G. (2009), The industry standard spaces of the old industrial regions, Space and Society.
23 (4). 45-60 ISSN 0237-7683
Marangos, J. (2014), A Keynesian alternative to the Washington consensus policies for international
development, International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 7(1) 67 – 85 doi:
10.1504/IJTGM.2014.058723
Ministry of Economy and Regional Development RS, Republican Bureau for Development,
(2011), Strategy of Industrial Development of Serbia in period 2011-2020, Government of
RS, Belgrade
Ministry of Finance of Republic of Serbia, Current Macroeconomic Trends, August 2021,
Belgrade
National Bank of Serbia, NBS, Inflation Report, February 2020, Belgrade
Statistical Office of RS, SORS, (2019), Economic trends in 2019, An Assessment, 2019, Belgrade
Stiglitz, J.E. (1999) Whither Reforms? Ten years of the transition, in Annual World Bank Conference
on Development Economics. Washington D.C. World Bank.
USAID, FREN, Ekonomski institut (2010) Postkrizni model ekonomskog rasta i razvoja Srbije
2011-2020, USAID, FREN, Ekonomski institut, Beograd.
Vujošević M., Zeković S. & Maričić T. (2010), Postsocijalistička tranzicija u Srbiji i teritorijalni
kapital Srbije: stanje, neki budući izgledi i predvidljivi scenariji, IAUS, Beograd ISBN:
978-86-80329-64-2
Vujošević M. (2010) Collapse of Strategic Thinking, Spatium, IAUS, Belgrade 23. 22-29 doi:
10.2298/SPAT1023022V
Vujosevic M.& Petovar K. (Ed.) (2008), Novi metodološki i teorijski pritstupi u izradi strategije
održivog regionalnog razvoja, Primer Zlatiborskog regiona, Centar za demokratiju,
IAUS, Beograd, 2008. ISBN 978-86-80329-56-7 (IAUS)
World Bank, (2020), Doing Business Report 2019, Washington D.C.
Granting construction permits on the local level, without a comprehensive development plan of the destination as a broaden development frame, was a wrong reforming step. It is complicated by political fighting between the top (Republican) level and local level of governing, regarding interests. An additional problem is related to the wrong defined place for decision – making process. Namely, Zlatibor became too large and too rich for its local capital, Čajetina.
The aim of the paper is firstly, to envisage development problems of Zlatibor, potentially “Mountain Kaludjerica”, like ecological, infrastructure and touristic disaster, if rapid, chaotic urbanization continues, and secondly, to point out some institutional, decision making and practical steps toward neutralization of these negative outcomes.
Keywords: Tourism; Sustainable development; Spatial development; Urbanism
REFERENCES
Bukvić, R. (2010) Morgentauov plan i Vašingtonski konsenzus: ima li razvojnog izlaza za zemlje
u tranziciji, Zbornik Kriza i razvoj, Institut društvenih nauka, Beograd, (pp7-28), ISBN:
978-86-7093-133-6
Boljanović, S.& Hadžić M. (2017) Impact of foreign direct investments on Serbian industry,
Industrija, 45 (3), 39-64. DOI: 310.5937
Chang, H.J. (2002), Breaking the mould: an institutionalist political economy alternative to the
neo-liberal theory of the market and the state. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26 (5):
539-559, doi:10.1093/CJE/26.5.539
Chang, H.J. and I. Grabel (2004) Reclaiming development from the Washington consensus, Journal
of post Keynesian economics, 27 (2): 273–291doi: 10.1080/01603477.2004.11051434.
European Commission, (2004), Fostering structural change, industrial policy in enlarged
Europe, EC, Brussels
European Commission (2010), Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive
Growth, EC, Brussels
Government of the Republic of Serbia. Ministry of Trade, Tourism and Telecommunications,
(2016), Strategy for the Development of Tourism of Serbia for the period 2016-2025,
Belgrade
International Monetary Fund (2021), World Economic Outlook, March 2021, Washington D.C.
Lux, G. (2009), The industry standard spaces of the old industrial regions, Space and Society.
23 (4). 45-60 ISSN 0237-7683
Marangos, J. (2014), A Keynesian alternative to the Washington consensus policies for international
development, International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 7(1) 67 – 85 doi:
10.1504/IJTGM.2014.058723
Ministry of Economy and Regional Development RS, Republican Bureau for Development,
(2011), Strategy of Industrial Development of Serbia in period 2011-2020, Government of
RS, Belgrade
Ministry of Finance of Republic of Serbia, Current Macroeconomic Trends, August 2021,
Belgrade
National Bank of Serbia, NBS, Inflation Report, February 2020, Belgrade
Statistical Office of RS, SORS, (2019), Economic trends in 2019, An Assessment, 2019, Belgrade
Stiglitz, J.E. (1999) Whither Reforms? Ten years of the transition, in Annual World Bank Conference
on Development Economics. Washington D.C. World Bank.
USAID, FREN, Ekonomski institut (2010) Postkrizni model ekonomskog rasta i razvoja Srbije
2011-2020, USAID, FREN, Ekonomski institut, Beograd.
Vujošević M., Zeković S. & Maričić T. (2010), Postsocijalistička tranzicija u Srbiji i teritorijalni
kapital Srbije: stanje, neki budući izgledi i predvidljivi scenariji, IAUS, Beograd ISBN:
978-86-80329-64-2
Vujošević M. (2010) Collapse of Strategic Thinking, Spatium, IAUS, Belgrade 23. 22-29 doi:
10.2298/SPAT1023022V
Vujosevic M.& Petovar K. (Ed.) (2008), Novi metodološki i teorijski pritstupi u izradi strategije
održivog regionalnog razvoja, Primer Zlatiborskog regiona, Centar za demokratiju,
IAUS, Beograd, 2008. ISBN 978-86-80329-56-7 (IAUS)
World Bank, (2020), Doing Business Report 2019, Washington D.C.
| tmt.2021-2022.501.pdf |
Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans
- UdEkoM Balkan -
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
E-mail: [email protected]
www.udekom.org.rs
- UdEkoM Balkan -
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
E-mail: [email protected]
www.udekom.org.rs
Tel. +381 62 812 5779
VAT number: 108747027
Registration number.: 28157347
Registration number.: 28157347