Balkans jetss - Vol 7 - No 2 - 2024
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balkans_JETSS_Vol_7_No_1_2024.pdf |
Balkans jetss - Vol 6 - No 2 - 2023
| Balkans_JETSS_Vol_6_No_2_2023.pdf |
Balkans jetss - Vol 6 - No 1 - 2023
| Balkans JETSS_Vol_6_No_1_2023 |
Balkans jetss - Vol 5 - No 2 - 2022
| Balkans JETSS_Vol_5_No_2_2022.pdf |
Balkans jetss - Vol 5 - No 1 - 2022
| Balkans JETSS_Vol_5_No_1_2022.pdf |
Balkans jetss - Vol 4 - No 2 - 2021
| Balkans JETSS_Vol 4_No 2_2021.pdf |
Balkans jetss - Vol 4 - No 1 - 2021
| Balkans JETSS_Vol_4_No_1_2021.pdf |
Balkans jetss - Vol 3 - No 2 - 2020
| Balkans JETSS_Vol 3_No 2_2020.pdf |
Balkans jetss - Vol 3 - No 1 - 2020
| Balkans JETSS_Vol 3_No 1_2020.pdf |
Balkans jetss - Vol 2 - No 2 - 2019
| Balkans JETSS_Vol 2_No 2_2019.pdf |
Balkans jetss - Vol 2 - No 1 - 2019
| Balkans JETSS_Vol_2_No_1_2019.pdf |
Balkans jetss - Vol 1 - No 1 - 2018
| Balkans_JETSS_Vol_1_No_1_2018.pdf |
The average time during which the preliminary assessment of manuscripts is conducted in 2023. (Days)
45
The average time during which the reviews of
manuscripts are conducted in 2022. (Days)
20
The average time in which the article is published in 2023. (Days)
150
45
The average time during which the reviews of
manuscripts are conducted in 2022. (Days)
20
The average time in which the article is published in 2023. (Days)
150
| balkans_jetss__paper_preparation_guidelines.pdf |
| balkans_jetss__author_statements.doc |
There is no submission or publication fee. Submission and publication of articles in the Balkans JETSS is free of any charges.
The mission of Balkans JETSS is to publish peer-review empirical research papers that test, extend or build theory and contribute to practice. All empirical methods – including, but not limited to, qualitative, quantitative, field, laboratory, and combination methods are welcome.
Empirical, theoretical and methodological articles from all major fields of economics, management, tourism, law and the like are featured in the journal. Theoretical and/or review articles that integrate existing bodies of research and that provide new insights into the field are also encouraged.
To be published in the Balkans JETSS, a manuscript must take strong empirical and/or theoretical contributions to the subject field. Consequently, preference is given to submissions that test, extend or build strong theoretical frameworks while empirically examining issues with high importance for theory and practice.
The journal is not tied to any particular discipline, level of analysis, or national context. Although, it focuses on Balkans region, all papers from related fields on any region or country are highly encouraged. Single country studies, multi-country or regional studies can be submitted.
Empirical, theoretical and methodological articles from all major fields of economics, management, tourism, law and the like are featured in the journal. Theoretical and/or review articles that integrate existing bodies of research and that provide new insights into the field are also encouraged.
To be published in the Balkans JETSS, a manuscript must take strong empirical and/or theoretical contributions to the subject field. Consequently, preference is given to submissions that test, extend or build strong theoretical frameworks while empirically examining issues with high importance for theory and practice.
The journal is not tied to any particular discipline, level of analysis, or national context. Although, it focuses on Balkans region, all papers from related fields on any region or country are highly encouraged. Single country studies, multi-country or regional studies can be submitted.
Balkans JETSS Registration and Peer Review Process
Full papers are submitted via email [email protected]. Each paper is reviewed in a double-blind peer review process. The double-blind review process ensure that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous during the peer review process. Authors do not know who conducted their reviews, reviewers do not know whose paper they are reviewing.
Peer reviewers are pre-registered on the website. At the beginning of the review period, peer reviewers are requested to confirm that they are available to review full papers.
Peer reviewers complete their review over unified form, which involves both multiple-choice selects and free-form comment assessments. Peer reviewers should be prepared to provide some detail, particularly for negative evaluations. Reviewers can provide feedback for the author, and also private feedback for the editor.
Authors will be notified by email if their paper has been accepted.
Peer reviewers provide a critical assessment of the paper, and may recommend improvements. Although the author may choose not to take this advice, it is highly recommended that the author address any issues, explaining why their research process or conclusions are correct.
Notes for Peer Reviewers
Peer reviewers should be aware that the MINIMUM time required to review a paper is at least 1 hour and significantly more time is common in order to do them justice.
Peer reviewers should be prepared to provide some detail, particularly for negative evaluations.
If you are invited to review a full paper, please consider:
Peer review of full papers is NOT about correcting grammar, spelling, poorly written references. It is about reviewing the academic validity and relevance of the paper! As a reviewer, if you find yourself correcting spelling, you are probably becoming bogged down in the detail, when you are meant to be assessing the “big picture”!
Full papers are evaluated against the following criteria:
1. The title, abstract and keywords must accurately reflect the paper’s contents.
2. The research must be relevant to the journal's scope.
3. The research methodology must be sound.
4. The paper must be well-structured and clearly written.
5. References must be relevant and accurate.
The journal's editorial board makes decisions where there is a significant discrepancy between reviewer evaluations. Authors may be asked to revise their full paper where it does not correspond to their abstract, where layout or references are formatted incorrectly, to correct grammar or improve on the paper quality.
Any identified plagiarism will automatically disqualify a paper.
Full papers are submitted via email [email protected]. Each paper is reviewed in a double-blind peer review process. The double-blind review process ensure that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous during the peer review process. Authors do not know who conducted their reviews, reviewers do not know whose paper they are reviewing.
Peer reviewers are pre-registered on the website. At the beginning of the review period, peer reviewers are requested to confirm that they are available to review full papers.
Peer reviewers complete their review over unified form, which involves both multiple-choice selects and free-form comment assessments. Peer reviewers should be prepared to provide some detail, particularly for negative evaluations. Reviewers can provide feedback for the author, and also private feedback for the editor.
Authors will be notified by email if their paper has been accepted.
Peer reviewers provide a critical assessment of the paper, and may recommend improvements. Although the author may choose not to take this advice, it is highly recommended that the author address any issues, explaining why their research process or conclusions are correct.
Notes for Peer Reviewers
Peer reviewers should be aware that the MINIMUM time required to review a paper is at least 1 hour and significantly more time is common in order to do them justice.
Peer reviewers should be prepared to provide some detail, particularly for negative evaluations.
If you are invited to review a full paper, please consider:
- Do you have time to do the review by the deadline?
- Is the article within your area of expertise?
- Are you sure you will complete the review by the deadline?
Peer review of full papers is NOT about correcting grammar, spelling, poorly written references. It is about reviewing the academic validity and relevance of the paper! As a reviewer, if you find yourself correcting spelling, you are probably becoming bogged down in the detail, when you are meant to be assessing the “big picture”!
Full papers are evaluated against the following criteria:
1. The title, abstract and keywords must accurately reflect the paper’s contents.
2. The research must be relevant to the journal's scope.
3. The research methodology must be sound.
4. The paper must be well-structured and clearly written.
5. References must be relevant and accurate.
The journal's editorial board makes decisions where there is a significant discrepancy between reviewer evaluations. Authors may be asked to revise their full paper where it does not correspond to their abstract, where layout or references are formatted incorrectly, to correct grammar or improve on the paper quality.
Any identified plagiarism will automatically disqualify a paper.
Publication Ethics & Malpractice Statement
Balkans JETSS is committed to the highest standards of publishing integrity and academic honesty as ensuring ethics in all its publications. The publication of an article in the journal contributes to growth of knowledge.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher. The journal's publisher will follow the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct.
Before submitting full paper for review or reviewing a paper please make sure you have read this Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement.
These instructions will ensure we have everything required so your submitted work can move through peer review, production and publication smoothly. Please take the time to read and follow them as closely as possible, as doing so will ensure your paper matches the ethical requirements.
The ethic statements given here are based on Elsevier policy according to Publishing Ethics Resource Kit for publishing ethics and malpractice statement, the Cambridge journals ethical standards, COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors, etc.
Duties of Authors
- Reporting standards
- Data Access and Retention
- Originality and Plagiarism
Text Recycling (Self-Plagiarism): Authors should not submit previously published work or reuse parts of their own previous work without appropriate citation. It is acceptable to submit a more developed work including novel contributions in order to present a research or a project at various stages of its evolution. In all cases authors should cite the previous work.
- Using Third-Party Material in your Paper
- Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
- Acknowledgement of Sources
- Authorship of the Paper
- Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
- Fundamental errors in published works
Duties of Reviewers
- Contribution to Editorial Decisions
- Promptness
- Confidentiality
- Standards of Objectivity
- Acknowledgement of Sources
- Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Duties of Editor
- Publication decisions
- Fair play
- Confidentiality
- Disclosure and conflicts of interest
The Balkans JETSS publisher shall guarantee the high technical and professional quality of the publications and that good practice and ethical standards are maintained. If any of the above mentioned unethical behaviors are identified, an investigation will be initiated and pertinent actions will be taken. For more information about best publishing ethical behaviors, authors are referred to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines:
http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines
Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans
- UdEkoM Balkan -
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
E-mail: [email protected]
www.udekom.org.rs
- UdEkoM Balkan -
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
E-mail: [email protected]
www.udekom.org.rs
Tel. +381 62 812 5779
VAT number: 108747027
Registration number.: 28157347
Registration number.: 28157347